Athens and Hadrian's
Relationship Status: It's Complicated.
The special
place Athens held in the minds of the Romans, due to their history and
influence in the Mediterranean, was significant. But more broadly, it was the
artistic, scientific and cultural accomplishments of the Hellenic people which
the Romans were ravenous for.
Building
designs, architectural elements, literary styles (poetry and playwriting) and
painting techniques, were all introduced to Romans after several having
enslaved and looted the Greek cities of Corinth and Epeiros. The goods were
paraded in long processions into the city of Rome exposed many for the first
time to the finer things Greek culture had to offer.
The legacy
of this influx of Greek art into the Roman landscape and cultural sphere meant
that those wealthy enough to possess these items were also possessed by them.
The drive to collect, copy and emulate the high art of Greece was strong. As
with art, literary and other cultural trends were brought in and filtered up
the social hierarchy of Rome.
As Rome took over politically and militarily,
they brought in droves of Greeks into the capital city, though most initially were
slaves. These slaves could be highly educated teachers, artisans, courtesans,
writers and labourers. Fashionable aristocratic households increasingly
required high-quality Greek tutors for their children, which would obviously
influence the tastes of their students. Eventually, we end at a point where the
Roman elite were importing tutors from Greece to educate their sons and
daughters in the language, philosophical and rhetorical practices.
The impact of Roman tastes in art can be seen in the photos above and below. A topic unto itself, is the Roman art trade - something which I am very interested in! However, as an example of what it actually meant to have a powerful empire capture and integrate Greek art and ideas into their own is highlighted through these works. As Italian families grew wealthier through empire building, they could afford the purchase of fine works of Greek provenance, or an Italian-made replica. The above examples, cargo from shipwrecks, illustrate the ocasional hazard of transportation.
Equestrian statue |
Farenese -style Herakles replica |
Isis Pelagia - Museum of Egyptology Turin - 2016 |
The impact of Roman tastes in art can be seen in the photos above and below. A topic unto itself, is the Roman art trade - something which I am very interested in! However, as an example of what it actually meant to have a powerful empire capture and integrate Greek art and ideas into their own is highlighted through these works. As Italian families grew wealthier through empire building, they could afford the purchase of fine works of Greek provenance, or an Italian-made replica. The above examples, cargo from shipwrecks, illustrate the ocasional hazard of transportation.
Even in their fractured states below, the Roman copies show an exquisite attention to detail and rendering of Greek styles. The costs for commissioning works such as these and their transport must have been a sizeable investment!
Crouching Venus - Museo Nazionale Romano - 2015 |
As
mentioned in the previous post, Greeks in Rome could achieve incredibly high
status and impact the values and development of future emperors. One such
student was the Emperor Hadrian. Educated in the literary traditions of Greece,
with notable emphasis on the visual arts, Hadrian was exposed to an
appreciation of Greek culture which resulted in exquisite building projects we
can see today.
The
influence of the ‘Romance of Athens’ on Hadrian, can be seen in his politics
and building programme. Hadrian instituted a Panhellenion, and made
Athens the capital city of this assembly of the Greek city-states, under Roman
rule. This assembly was perhaps an attempt to hearken back to the period of a
unified Greece emblematic of the 5th century BCE, their classical
heyday. For political expedience and cohesion this move makes sense, but there
is also an element of romanticising or idealising the Classical period of
Greece by Hadrian, the philhellene (lover of Greekness).
A Roman copy of the Discuss Thrower (Discobolus) - Museo Nazionale Romano 2015 |
The
emphasis of Roman investment into the architectural landscape of Greece had a
political motivation behind it. The Romans were basically carrying on the
policy of Hellenistic eugeritism.
Having
control over powerful former empires and influential cities enriched Rome’s cultural
and political capital. Affixing their brand, sometimes directly over-top of a
pre-existing architectural and social spaces in this ancient city, allowed them
to write themselves into the history of Greece – a history which no one could
deny was impressive and marked the most important events in the collective
consciousness, often blurring between myth and reality.
I have been
lucky enough to have a few encounters with this temple, and it never fails to
impress. The massive and intricate Corinthian capitals and fluted columns are
familiar examples of what people expect when they go to archaeological sites of
the Mediterranean. However, these columns speak to the Roman habit of embedding
their brand on to the architectural landscape of Greece as it linked itself
into the story of pre-democratic Athens.
The temple
was built on the foundations of a pre-existing sacred outdoor sanctuary and
temple to Zeus. The previous temple structure, built in around 520 BCE by
the tyrant co-rulers of Athens, Hippias and Hipparchus, had commissioned a more
monumental temple than had existed previously under their father, Peisistratus.
They demolished their father’s temple, and set to the task of building a more
magnificent temple. However, their lofty building programme would remain
unfinished. The young tyrants were ousted after a salacious and political
scandal turned Athenian sentiment against them. In a series of
‘Telemondo’-esque unrequited love triangle developments, Hipparchus coveted
Harmodius, who was already Aristogeiton’s lover. Insinuations and insults
abounded on all sides, leading to the two lovers murdering Harmodius and later
being killed themselves. Hippias was ultimately overthrown in a
Spartan-supported coup, and made way for the democratic government in Athens to
take shape.
Corinthian topped-columns -2016 |
Temple of Olympian Zeus - 2016 |
Hubris,
which brings us to the next phase of the history of this temple - the
Olympieion. Whilst Hadrian set to work in the 120s CE on rebuilding the
supermassive temple to Olympian Zeus, which was completed and dedicated in 131
CE. Hadrian, who at times was believed to call himself 'Olympian' had an altar
to himself installed here as well.
Leads on to wonder who
precisely was being worshiped here?
The Arch of Hadrian
This arch is not the triumphal sort you see in Rome, where the Emperor or senate would commission for the arch for an impressive military victory, but rather, this arch was an honorific from the Panhellenes or the Athenians themselves.
Situated next to the Olympeion, the Arch of Hadrian has quite a few stylistically complex elements and details which are exemplary of Athenian architecture done in a Roman-style. Created from solid Pentelic marble, Corinthian capitals atop pilasters among other features, are representative of architectural imagery in Roman wall painting. There were sculptures in the central niche, it has been suggested, which were of Hadrian and Theseus. This is not such an odd paring when you consider the inscriptions.
The inscription towards the Acropolis (below) states "This is Athens, the ancient city of Theseus", who was part of the mythical founding. The other side facing the Olympeion reads, "This is the city of Hadrian, and not of Theseus". These inscriptions denoted the physical and symbolic relationships of the Athenians; their glorious mythical past and their Roman present were delineated by this liminal space.
This, like other examples of eugeritism (benefaction), is how the reciprocal relationship worked. It was expected that they offer honours to Hadrian in this fashion, but that did not necessarily mean everyone was happy with the Romans having control in Greece.
The Arch of Hadrian
This arch is not the triumphal sort you see in Rome, where the Emperor or senate would commission for the arch for an impressive military victory, but rather, this arch was an honorific from the Panhellenes or the Athenians themselves.
Situated next to the Olympeion, the Arch of Hadrian has quite a few stylistically complex elements and details which are exemplary of Athenian architecture done in a Roman-style. Created from solid Pentelic marble, Corinthian capitals atop pilasters among other features, are representative of architectural imagery in Roman wall painting. There were sculptures in the central niche, it has been suggested, which were of Hadrian and Theseus. This is not such an odd paring when you consider the inscriptions.
The inscription towards the Acropolis (below) states "This is Athens, the ancient city of Theseus", who was part of the mythical founding. The other side facing the Olympeion reads, "This is the city of Hadrian, and not of Theseus". These inscriptions denoted the physical and symbolic relationships of the Athenians; their glorious mythical past and their Roman present were delineated by this liminal space.
This, like other examples of eugeritism (benefaction), is how the reciprocal relationship worked. It was expected that they offer honours to Hadrian in this fashion, but that did not necessarily mean everyone was happy with the Romans having control in Greece.
Hadrian’s
Library
Situated in
the Roman Agora, on the north-slope below the Acropolis, Hadrian’s library
would have been a richly decorated and comfortable centre of intellectual
pursuits. The great classics of Athenian theatre were housed in this, perhaps
the greatest, of Hadrianic homages to the city that he loved so much.
Inner-east wall under reconstruction - 2008 |
East-facing outwards - 2016 |
West-facing outwards - 2008 |
Library Complex - 2008 |
Library Complex - 2016 |
One of the
key buildings in the Roman Agora of Athens, which continues to impress tourists
on the north side of the Acropolis, is the Tower of the Winds. As with the
other buildings in Athens, it was built of that familiar Pentelic marble into a
twelve-meter high clock tower. The building had just been restored with the
scaffolding removed before I arrived, which was excellent timing to see a very
ornate and beautiful ‘horologion’, or timepiece.
The building
we see today, as in all things, is not complete. In antiquity, it would have
been topped with a bronze (possibly) weathervane of Triton that would tell a
passerby the direction the wind was blowing. If this seems irrelevant to modern
viewers, we should always try to take into account that every piece of
technology available at the time was as good as could be hoped for. In the
seafaring culture of the Hellenes (Greeks), any advantage or extra measures
taken for the weather and time was a useful tool.
The Doric Gateway
The Roman Agora shows another product of the Italic investment in the city of Athens. Marking the entrance to the west of the Agora, it bears a dedication to ‘Athena the Originator’, not unlike the other monuments in Athens. However, the Roman gifted through the generosity of Julius Caesar and his son, the Emperor Caesar Augustus.
The Roman Agora shows another product of the Italic investment in the city of Athens. Marking the entrance to the west of the Agora, it bears a dedication to ‘Athena the Originator’, not unlike the other monuments in Athens. However, the Roman gifted through the generosity of Julius Caesar and his son, the Emperor Caesar Augustus.
Indulging me
for a moment, let’s unpack that inscription. Augustus’
ascension followed Julius Caesar’s death, a surprise adoption, which ultimately
led to Augustus’ years’ long civil war to wrestle control over the Roman
Republic. As Augustus defeated his competitors, Mark Anthony and Cleopatra, and
thousands of Italian dead from both sides of the conflict, he sought to rebuild
and polish his image. Further discussion about the impact and persona of
Emperor Augustus will follow, but for now, you can rightly imagine, feelings
were mixed among the survivors of the war and the purges which followed. Families
loyal to the losing side were eliminated and embraced dependent upon their
willingness to acquiesce to Augustus.
Part of the
importance of smoothing over relations rested in the image he tried to sell,
was to gain legitimacy.
Thank you for checking out my post!
Feel free to leave comments, messages or questions.
No comments:
Post a Comment